MUZA writes your landing page and your Google and Meta campaigns from the same brief, so the ad and the page make the same promise. Then it checks both against the rules the platforms actually enforce.
Free while MUZA is in beta. No card, no trial clock, published on a real address.
Google Search
Diagnosis in 90 minutes or the visit is free. Parts in the van for 8 of 10 common failures.
Meta Feed
It is 98 degrees and the unit is dead. We keep four vans loaded for exactly this. Book a window, get a text when the tech lea… See more
Landing page
Austin Air Co.
Diagnosis in 90 minutes or the visit is free. Four vans, parts on board, a text when the tech leaves the depot.
What comes back
Tonight: one in eleven clicks lands on something that is not a control.
The blame gap
The page builder has never seen your keywords. The ads tool has never read your page. Each one reports success in its own dashboard: the campaign got clicks, the page got visits.
And when the month ends with no leads, there is no artifact anywhere that says which half lost them. So the next month gets a new agency, a new headline, and the same result.
MUZA closes the gap by refusing to build the halves separately. One promise goes into the ad and into the page headline. When the two stop matching, that is a finding, not an opinion.
How it works
A loop is one promise expressed twice, plus what visitors did about it. You build it once and then keep editing the half that is losing people.
Eight fields. What you sell, who buys it, what proof you actually have, what a lead is worth to you.
One promise is written first. Then a landing page and campaigns for Google and Meta that repeat it.
Every check runs before launch. Blocking findings hold the button down until they are fixed.
The published page records what visitors did. Overnight it is turned into a diagnosis with a fix attached.
Written to the limit
Google rejects an over-length headline at upload and takes the ad group down with it. Meta accepts it and hides the end behind “See more”, which is worse, because it looks like it worked.
MUZA writes to the limit and shows the cut where the platform makes it. The preview on the right is the same component the editor uses.
Google allows 30 characters per headline and needs at least 3. MUZA writes 15, all distinct, with your main keyword in at least three.
Diagnosis in 90 minutes or the visit is free. Parts in the van for 8 of 10 common failures.
Preflight
Before a loop goes live it is checked against about two dozen rules. They are deterministic: the same loop always produces the same list, and the model that wrote the copy does not get a vote on whether the copy is legal.
Ads point at a page a stranger cannot act on. Every click becomes a bounce, and the spend is unrecoverable.
The ad said one thing and the H1 says another. The visitor has to re-read the page to find out they are in the right place, and most will not.
Meta needs something to choose between. Two angles per set is the minimum that teaches you anything about the audience.
Twenty more, including budget below the learning floor and a keyword that appears in none of your headlines.
After launch
The published page reports what visitors did with it. Not a heatmap to admire: five numbers that point at a half.
How far down the page the median visitor got before leaving.
Reads as: a promise that stopped being believed at a specific section.
How many people saw the form, and how many typed one character into it.
Reads as: a form asking for something people are not ready to give yet.
Clicks that landed on something that was never clickable.
Reads as: a page whose design promised an action it did not have.
MUZA does not promise leads. Nobody honest can. What it removes is the month where there were none and nobody could say why.
Price
Every feature, for every account, with no card and no trial clock. There is nothing to cancel and nothing to downgrade to.
Generation runs on a shared model chain with its own rate limits. 60 builds a month per account keeps one heavy user from stopping everyone else. It is not a price, and if you hit it, ask and it moves.
You will be told before it does, not after. Loops built during the beta keep working, and the page HTML is exportable at any point, with no runtime dependency on us.
Questions
No, and be careful with anyone who does. What is guaranteed is that the ad and the page will say the same thing, that nothing over a platform limit reaches upload, and that when a month goes badly you will have a specific answer about which half lost the visitors.
Not today. MUZA builds the campaigns and exports them: a CSV for Google Ads Editor and a bulk sheet for Meta. You review and upload them in your own accounts, which is also where the budget stays under your control. Direct API connections are next.
A routed chain rather than a single vendor, with automatic fallback when a provider is down or rate limited. You do not pick a model and you do not bring a key.
All of it. The page opens in a visual editor where you click any element and change it, and every ad asset is an ordinary text field with the platform counter next to it. Regeneration is a request, not a reset.
Actually free. There is no checkout in the product at all right now: every feature is on for every account, and the only limit is a fair-use cap of 60 AI builds a month, which exists because the model chain is shared and one account should not be able to stall it. When pricing arrives you will hear about it beforehand, and loops built during the beta keep working.
You can export the full HTML at any time, and it runs anywhere with no dependency on us. The muza.page address stops serving when you delete the loop, and not before.
On a muza.page address immediately, or on your own domain on Pro and above. Pages are served from the edge, so the load time your ads are scored on is not the thing that costs you.
Write what you sell and who buys it. Come back to a page, two campaigns and a list of everything that would have gone wrong.